Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Darden v. State

Darden v. State

318 S.W.3d 327, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1124, 2010 WL 3394656
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 31, 2010
DocketWD 71220
StatusPublished

This text of 318 S.W.3d 327 (Darden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darden v. State, 318 S.W.3d 327, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1124, 2010 WL 3394656 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Darden appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Darden claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Darden
263 S.W.3d 760 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 S.W.3d 327, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1124, 2010 WL 3394656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darden-v-state-moctapp-2010.