Darden v. State
318 S.W.3d 327, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1124, 2010 WL 3394656
Opinion
ORDER
James Darden appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Darden claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Darden v. State, 318 S.W.3d 327, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1124, 2010 WL 3394656 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
318 S.W.3d 327 (Darden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Darden
263 S.W.3d 760 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)