Darden v. State

25 S.E. 676, 97 Ga. 407
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 7, 1896·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Following the decision of this court in Jackson v. The State, 91 Ga. 322, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to convict the accused of an assault with intent to commit rape, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Arthur Hood, for plaintiff in error. John R. Irwin? solicitor-general, by W. M. Harper, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darden v. State, 25 S.E. 676, 97 Ga. 407 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 676 (Darden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
61 S.E.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Harper v. State
40 S.E.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Patrick v. State
29 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Pickett v. State
186 S.E. 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Williams v. State
186 S.E. 143 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Davis v. State
169 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
McCullough v. State
73 S.E. 546 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)