Darden v. State

330 So. 2d 750
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1976
Docket75-895
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 330 So. 2d 750 (Darden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darden v. State, 330 So. 2d 750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

330 So.2d 750 (1976)

Willie Jasper DARDEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-895.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 30, 1976.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Robert H. Grizzard, II, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We previously affirmed the appellant's convictions but vacated the general 20-year sentence for robbery and assault with intent to commit first degree murder with firearms, and vacated the judgment and sentence for using a firearm while committing a felony. We remanded for resentencing with directions to the trial court to apportion the appellant's negotiated 20-year sentence between the robbery and the assault convictions. Darden v. State, Fla. App.2d 1975, 306 So.2d 581.

The trial judge apparently misconstrued our previous opinion since upon remand he sentenced the appellant Darden to 20 years for robbery and 15 years for assault with intent to commit first degree murder with firearms, with the sentences to run concurrently.

We now vacate the sentences and again remand to the trial court with directions that the negotiated 20-year sentence be apportioned between the robbery and the assault counts. It was improper to sentence the appellant for 20 years on one count and then impose any further sentence, albeit concurrent, on the other count. The sum total of all sentences to be imposed must not exceed 20 years.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gold v. State
402 So. 2d 1364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Shabazz v. State
367 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Daudt v. State
368 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Harvey v. State
365 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Fundak v. State
362 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Benefield v. State
351 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Burgess v. State
347 So. 2d 1089 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Loose v. State
347 So. 2d 817 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Clark v. State
338 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 So. 2d 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darden-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.