Dardashti v. Bronstein

824 So. 2d 934, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9645, 2002 WL 1466223
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 2002
DocketNos. 3D02-349, 3D02-334
StatusPublished

This text of 824 So. 2d 934 (Dardashti v. Bronstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dardashti v. Bronstein, 824 So. 2d 934, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9645, 2002 WL 1466223 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sanar Clinical Rehab. Ctr., Inc., 766 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Automobile Insurance v. Sanar Clinical Rehab Center, Inc.
766 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
824 So. 2d 934, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9645, 2002 WL 1466223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dardashti-v-bronstein-fladistctapp-2002.