Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 575 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-25-148
DARDANELLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Opinion Delivered December 3, 2025 AND ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
V. [NO. H305182]
ANDREA EWTON AFFIRMED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
Dardanelle Public Schools (DPS) and its insurance carrier, Arkansas School Boards
Association (ASBA), appeal the Commission’s decision that Andrea Ewton suffered a
compensable injury because she was within the scope of her employment when the injury
occurred. We affirm.
I. Relevant Facts
Andrea Ewton filed a workers’-compensation claim for injuries to her knee and ankle
she sustained while working for DPS. Ewton asserted that she was eligible for temporary
total-disability benefits from August 16, 2023, to a date yet to be determined, reasonable and
necessary medical treatment, and attorney’s fees. DPS controverted the claim, contending
that she was on a personal errand and not performing any employment services or advancing
her employer’s interest at the time of the injury. A hearing was held on August 1, 2024. At the hearing, Ewton testified that on August
15, 2023, she was working as a substitute custodian at the Dardanelle intermediate school.
When she arrived on campus, she went into the main office and filled out her time sheet,
clocked in, and was given keys by the school secretary, Becca Manatt. She testified that
around 8:15 a.m., while she was on the clock, she walked to her car through the school
parking lot to get a bottle of water and keys she needed to clean the agricultural and
electronics buildings. Ewton explained that Manatt had given her the wrong keys that
morning, but she had a set in her car that would open those buildings. On the way, she
stepped off the curb and broke her ankle and injured her knee. She stated that she reported
the injury to both Manatt and the school nurse, April McGuire. Ewton was cross-examined
about an earlier statement in her deposition that when she arrived at the intermediate school
office, she went to get the keys for the gym and the technology lab. She explained that Manatt
was there, but she got the keys from McGuire. Ewton did not recall speaking with the claims
supervisor for the ASBA. Ewton testified that she had not worked since the date of the
accident.
Becca Manatt testified that she did not remember if she gave Ewton keys the morning
of the accident, but she remembered that when Ewton came into the office after she had
been injured, she referred Ewton to the school nurse. She said that generally she did not give
out keys, and the custodians kept the keys to the technology building and the gym in their
closet; however, there were times that she had given out keys.
2 April McGuire testified that on the day of the accident, Ewton came into her office,
and she put ice on Ewton’s ankle. McGuire explained that Ewton told her that “she had
been walking out to her car to get a drink and slipped off the curb.” McGuire contacted the
claims supervisor for the ASBA, Misty Thompson, to let her know about the accident.
McGuire remembers telling Ewton that she was not sure that her injury would be covered
by workers’ compensation.
Thompson testified that on the morning of August 15, 2023, she received a call from
DPS, which was recorded. According to the transcript of the recorded phone call, Ewton
explained that at the time of the accident, she was walking to her car to get a bottle of water
she had left there. When Thompson asked her if there was any other purpose for going to
her car, she replied, “No, ma’am.”
On August 12, 2024, the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) opinion was entered. In
it, the ALJ determined that Ewton failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
she suffered a compensable injury to her left knee and right ankle because she was not
performing employment services at the time of her injury. The ALJ did not find credible
Ewton’s testimony that she had returned to her car to get a set of keys and cited Ewton’s
shifting story about who had given her keys that morning. The ALJ noted that Ewton’s
explanation about why she was going to her car changed from getting a drink to getting keys
necessary to do her job. The ALJ also found that although Ewton claimed she had not
worked since the date of the accident, her unemployment application showed that she had
3 worked full time for Dardanelle Nursing & Rehabilitation from October 5, 2023, to
February 22, 2024. Ewton appealed to the Full Commission (Commission).
On January 16, 2025, the Commission entered the decision reversing the ALJ,
determining that Ewton had proved by a preponderance of the evidence that she sustained
a compensable injury. The ALJ found that Ewton was entitled to temporary total-disability
benefits beginning August 16, 2023, through June 22, 2024, and her attorney was entitled
to fees, plus an additional $500 for prevailing on appeal. The Commission credited Ewton’s
testimony that she obtained keys from Manatt when she arrived on campus. The
Commission also found credible Ewton’s testimony that she was on the clock and on campus
at the time the accident, and she was on her way to her car to get keys to the building and a
bottle of water when she fell and injured herself. The Commission additionally found that
Ewton had proved that the injury was compensable because she testified that at the time of
the accident, she was on the clock, not on a break, and on campus.
DPS and ASBA timely filed a notice of appeal, and this appeal followed.
II. Standard of Review
When reviewing a decision of the Commission, we view the evidence and all
reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the findings of the
Commission. Ark. Dep’t of Parks & Tourism v. Price, 2016 Ark. App. 109, 483 S.W.3d 320.
We must affirm the decision of the Commission if it is supported by substantial evidence.
Id. Substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to
support a conclusion of the Commission. Id. We reverse the Commission’s decision only if
4 we are convinced that fair-minded persons could not have reached the same conclusion with
the same facts before them. Bronco Indus. Servs., LLC v. Brooks, 2021 Ark. App. 279, 625
S.W.3d 753.
III. Discussion
For its sole point on appeal, DPS contends that the Commission erred in finding that
Ewton offered substantial evidence that she sustained a compensable injury. Specifically,
DPS argues that she did not prove the accident occurred when she was within the scope of
her employment because she gave inconsistent testimony regarding her purpose for going to
her car. We disagree.
Arkansas Code Annotated section 11-9-102(4)(A)(i) (Supp. 2023) defines a
compensable injury as “[a]n accidental injury causing internal or external physical harm to
the body . . . arising out of and in the course of employment and which requires medical
services or results in disability or death. For an accidental injury to be compensable, it must
arise out of and in the course of employment. Id. A compensable injury does not include an
injury incurred when employment services were not being performed. Id. § 11-9-
102(4)(B)(iii).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 575 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-25-148
DARDANELLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Opinion Delivered December 3, 2025 AND ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
V. [NO. H305182]
ANDREA EWTON AFFIRMED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
Dardanelle Public Schools (DPS) and its insurance carrier, Arkansas School Boards
Association (ASBA), appeal the Commission’s decision that Andrea Ewton suffered a
compensable injury because she was within the scope of her employment when the injury
occurred. We affirm.
I. Relevant Facts
Andrea Ewton filed a workers’-compensation claim for injuries to her knee and ankle
she sustained while working for DPS. Ewton asserted that she was eligible for temporary
total-disability benefits from August 16, 2023, to a date yet to be determined, reasonable and
necessary medical treatment, and attorney’s fees. DPS controverted the claim, contending
that she was on a personal errand and not performing any employment services or advancing
her employer’s interest at the time of the injury. A hearing was held on August 1, 2024. At the hearing, Ewton testified that on August
15, 2023, she was working as a substitute custodian at the Dardanelle intermediate school.
When she arrived on campus, she went into the main office and filled out her time sheet,
clocked in, and was given keys by the school secretary, Becca Manatt. She testified that
around 8:15 a.m., while she was on the clock, she walked to her car through the school
parking lot to get a bottle of water and keys she needed to clean the agricultural and
electronics buildings. Ewton explained that Manatt had given her the wrong keys that
morning, but she had a set in her car that would open those buildings. On the way, she
stepped off the curb and broke her ankle and injured her knee. She stated that she reported
the injury to both Manatt and the school nurse, April McGuire. Ewton was cross-examined
about an earlier statement in her deposition that when she arrived at the intermediate school
office, she went to get the keys for the gym and the technology lab. She explained that Manatt
was there, but she got the keys from McGuire. Ewton did not recall speaking with the claims
supervisor for the ASBA. Ewton testified that she had not worked since the date of the
accident.
Becca Manatt testified that she did not remember if she gave Ewton keys the morning
of the accident, but she remembered that when Ewton came into the office after she had
been injured, she referred Ewton to the school nurse. She said that generally she did not give
out keys, and the custodians kept the keys to the technology building and the gym in their
closet; however, there were times that she had given out keys.
2 April McGuire testified that on the day of the accident, Ewton came into her office,
and she put ice on Ewton’s ankle. McGuire explained that Ewton told her that “she had
been walking out to her car to get a drink and slipped off the curb.” McGuire contacted the
claims supervisor for the ASBA, Misty Thompson, to let her know about the accident.
McGuire remembers telling Ewton that she was not sure that her injury would be covered
by workers’ compensation.
Thompson testified that on the morning of August 15, 2023, she received a call from
DPS, which was recorded. According to the transcript of the recorded phone call, Ewton
explained that at the time of the accident, she was walking to her car to get a bottle of water
she had left there. When Thompson asked her if there was any other purpose for going to
her car, she replied, “No, ma’am.”
On August 12, 2024, the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) opinion was entered. In
it, the ALJ determined that Ewton failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
she suffered a compensable injury to her left knee and right ankle because she was not
performing employment services at the time of her injury. The ALJ did not find credible
Ewton’s testimony that she had returned to her car to get a set of keys and cited Ewton’s
shifting story about who had given her keys that morning. The ALJ noted that Ewton’s
explanation about why she was going to her car changed from getting a drink to getting keys
necessary to do her job. The ALJ also found that although Ewton claimed she had not
worked since the date of the accident, her unemployment application showed that she had
3 worked full time for Dardanelle Nursing & Rehabilitation from October 5, 2023, to
February 22, 2024. Ewton appealed to the Full Commission (Commission).
On January 16, 2025, the Commission entered the decision reversing the ALJ,
determining that Ewton had proved by a preponderance of the evidence that she sustained
a compensable injury. The ALJ found that Ewton was entitled to temporary total-disability
benefits beginning August 16, 2023, through June 22, 2024, and her attorney was entitled
to fees, plus an additional $500 for prevailing on appeal. The Commission credited Ewton’s
testimony that she obtained keys from Manatt when she arrived on campus. The
Commission also found credible Ewton’s testimony that she was on the clock and on campus
at the time the accident, and she was on her way to her car to get keys to the building and a
bottle of water when she fell and injured herself. The Commission additionally found that
Ewton had proved that the injury was compensable because she testified that at the time of
the accident, she was on the clock, not on a break, and on campus.
DPS and ASBA timely filed a notice of appeal, and this appeal followed.
II. Standard of Review
When reviewing a decision of the Commission, we view the evidence and all
reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the findings of the
Commission. Ark. Dep’t of Parks & Tourism v. Price, 2016 Ark. App. 109, 483 S.W.3d 320.
We must affirm the decision of the Commission if it is supported by substantial evidence.
Id. Substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to
support a conclusion of the Commission. Id. We reverse the Commission’s decision only if
4 we are convinced that fair-minded persons could not have reached the same conclusion with
the same facts before them. Bronco Indus. Servs., LLC v. Brooks, 2021 Ark. App. 279, 625
S.W.3d 753.
III. Discussion
For its sole point on appeal, DPS contends that the Commission erred in finding that
Ewton offered substantial evidence that she sustained a compensable injury. Specifically,
DPS argues that she did not prove the accident occurred when she was within the scope of
her employment because she gave inconsistent testimony regarding her purpose for going to
her car. We disagree.
Arkansas Code Annotated section 11-9-102(4)(A)(i) (Supp. 2023) defines a
compensable injury as “[a]n accidental injury causing internal or external physical harm to
the body . . . arising out of and in the course of employment and which requires medical
services or results in disability or death. For an accidental injury to be compensable, it must
arise out of and in the course of employment. Id. A compensable injury does not include an
injury incurred when employment services were not being performed. Id. § 11-9-
102(4)(B)(iii). An employee is performing employment services when he or she is doing
something that is generally required by his or her employer. Cont’l Constr. Co. v. Nabors, 2015
Ark. App. 60, 454 S.W.3d 762. We use the same test to determine whether an employee is
performing employment services as we do when determining whether an employee is acting
within the course and scope of employment. Pifer v. Single Source Transp., 347 Ark. 851, 69
S.W.3d 1 (2002). The test is whether the injury occurred within the time and space
5 boundaries of the employment when the employee was carrying out the employer’s purpose
or advancing the employer’s interest, either directly or indirectly. Id. Moreover, whether an
employee was performing employment services within the course of employment depends
on the particular facts and circumstances of each case. Ctrs. for Youth & Families v. Wood,
2015 Ark. App. 380, 466 S.W.3d 422.
DPS compares the instant case to Fulbright v. St. Bernard’s Medical Center, 2016 Ark.
App. 417, 502 S.W.3d 540, in which this court affirmed the Commission’s determination
that the appellant, a laundry aide for St. Bernard’s, was not within the scope of her
employment when she tripped and fell returning from a smoke break. The claimant testified
that “she was indirectly benefiting her employer by getting something to eat so that she could
have energy to do the physical labor associated with her work.” 2016 Ark. App. 417, at 2,
502 S.W.3d at 542. The Commission found that she was on a personal errand; thus, the
injury was not compensable. The difference between Fulbright and the instant case is that
here, aside from the bottle of water, Ewton was also retrieving keys to open the buildings so
she could perform her job duties; thus, Fulbright is inapplicable here.
DPS cites several cases along these lines for support. In Hill v. LDA Leasing, Inc., 2010
Ark. App. 271, 374 S.W.3d 268, this court affirmed the denial of benefits when the
employee, who was returning from the restroom and stopped at a vending machine to buy a
snack, slipped and fell. In Black v. First Step, Inc., 2014 Ark. App. 341,this court affirmed the
Commission’s decision that a personal-care aide who stopped to buy food for her client was
acting outside the scope of her employment because buying food was not one of her job
6 duties. In Campbell v. Randal Tyler Ford Mercury, Inc., 70 Ark. App. 35, 13 S.W.3d 916 (2000),
this court affirmed the Commission’s decision that a man who had taken work home with
him on the weekend and was on his way to work when he died in a car accident was not
acting within the scope of his employment because he was not working when he died. In
McKinney v. Trane Co., 84 Ark. App. 424, 143 S.W.3d 581 (2004), this court affirmed the
Commission’s decision that appellant’s accident, which occurred when he was getting a soda
to go outside for his smoke break, was not compensable even though he was under an
obligation to “report anything askew in the workplace had he observed it during that time.”
The pattern in each of these cases only reinforces that this court affirms the
Commission when the credibility of the witness is the issue on appeal. It is well settled that
questions of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to be given their testimony are within the
exclusive province of the Commission. Sheridan Sch. Dist. v. Wise, 2021 Ark. App. 459, 637
S.W.3d 280. Here, Ewton testified at the hearing that she was getting keys from her car to
clean the buildings pursuant to her job duty. DPS claims that the “ALJ accurately noted that
he did not find Ms. Ewton’s testimony that she was going to her car to get keys to be
credible.” We give no weight to the ALJ’s findings whatsoever. Bean v. Reynolds Consumer
Prods., 2022 Ark. App. 276, 646 S.W.3d 655; Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc. v. Yousey, 2018 Ark.
107, 542 S.W.3d 155; Johnson v. Hux, 28 Ark. App. 187, 772 S.W.2d 362 (1989); Clark v.
Peabody Testing Serv., 265 Ark. 489, 579 S.W.2d 360 (1979). Ewton’s inconsistent earlier
statements are for the Commission to weigh, and once the Commission has made its
decision on issues of credibility, this court is bound by that decision. Id.
7 Affirmed.
GLADWIN and HARRISON, JJ., agree.
Worley, Wood & Parrish, P.A., by: Melissa Wood, for appellants.
Caldwell Law Firm, P.A., by: Andy L. Caldwell, for appellee.