Darcy D. Fuller v. Bruce Chatman, Warden

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 3, 2014·No. A14A0808·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ February 03, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A0808. DARCY D. FULLER v. BRUCE CHATMAN et al.

Prison inmate Darcy D. Fuller has appealed directly to this Court from the trial court’s order denying his motion to waive in forma pauperis filing fees in this mandamus action. The Supreme Court, however, has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving extraordinary remedies, including mandamus. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5); Ladzinske v. Allen, 280 Ga. 264 (626 SE2d 83) (2006) (“‘[C]ases involving the grant or denial of mandamus are within the exclusive jurisdiction of [the Supreme] Court without regard to the underlying subject matter or the legal issues raised.’”). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 02/03/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darcy D. Fuller v. Bruce Chatman, Warden, (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Darcy D. Fuller v. Bruce Chatman, Warden (Darcy D. Fuller v. Bruce Chatman, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ladzinske v. Allen
626 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)