Darby's Heirs v. Richardson

26 Ky. 544, 3 J.J. Marsh. 544, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 116
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedApril 16, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ky. 544 (Darby's Heirs v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darby's Heirs v. Richardson, 26 Ky. 544, 3 J.J. Marsh. 544, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 116 (Ky. Ct. App. 1830).

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The consideration is sufficient in this case, -to entitle the defendant in error to a specific execution of the contract.

But the circuit court erred in its decree.

1st. As the covenant was for a quit claim deed, the court ought not to have decreed a general warranty deed.

2d. There should have been no decree against Bleight’s heirs, until they had been represented by a guardian ad litem.

Wherefore, the decree is reversed, and the cause remanded, for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ky. 544, 3 J.J. Marsh. 544, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darbys-heirs-v-richardson-kyctapp-1830.