Darby v. Saeli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Darby v. Saeli

6 A.D.2d 1043, 179 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4694

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 1043 (Darby v. Saeli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Darby v. Saeli, 6 A.D.2d 1043, 179 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In a consolidated action to recover damages for injuries to person and property and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motion for a preference in the trial of the action. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without prejudice to the right of respondents to renew the motion on proper proof. The motion was granted pursuant to subdivision (d) of rule 8 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules after the failure to consummate a settlement upon a pretrial conference. This record contains no facts from which it may be found that the interests of justice will be best served by granting a preference in the trial of this action. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a consolidated action to recover damages for injuries to person and property and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motion for a preference in the trial of the action. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without prejudice to the right of respondents to renew the motion on proper proof. The motion was granted pursuant to subdivision (d) of rule 8 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules after the failure to consummate a settlement upon a pretrial conference. This record contains no facts from which it may be found that the interests of justice will be best served by granting a preference in the trial of this action. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 1043, 179 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darby-v-saeli-nyappdiv-1958.