Darby v. A-Best Products Co.

788 N.E.2d 645, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1408
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 16, 2003
Docket2003-0300
StatusPublished

This text of 788 N.E.2d 645 (Darby v. A-Best Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darby v. A-Best Products Co., 788 N.E.2d 645, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 81270, 2002-0hio-7070. On discretionary appeal, motion for admission pro hac vice of Ellen Margolis and Danile Markewich by Bruce Mandel for Vilad Corp., and motion for admission pro hac vice of Jon B. Orandorff by Bruce Mandel for Old Orchard Industrial Corp. etc. Discretionary appeal allowed and motions granted.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
788 N.E.2d 645, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darby-v-a-best-products-co-ohio-2003.