Darbouze v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 2017·No. 16-2556·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 10, 2017. ________________

No. 3D16-2556 Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-28024, 14-11754 & 14-27811 ________________

Pierre Michel Darbouze, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge.

Pierre Michel Darbouze, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM. Pierre Michel Darbouze appeals an order denying as untimely his motion for

postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Based on

the record before us and the State’s proper and commendable confession of error

that his motion was timely because the trial court incorrectly calculated the date

Darbouze’s judgments and sentences became final, we reverse and remand for

further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darbouze v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Darbouze v. State (Darbouze v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.