Darbouze v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Darbouze v. State

217 So. 3d 1192, 2017 WL 1927714, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6582

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 2017

DocketNo. 3D16-2556

StatusPublished

This text of 217 So. 3d 1192 (Darbouze v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Darbouze v. State, 217 So. 3d 1192, 2017 WL 1927714, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6582 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pierre Michel Darbouze appeals an order denying as untimely his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Based on the record before us and the State’s proper and commendable confession of error that his motion was timely because the trial court incorrectly calculated the date Dar-bouze’s judgments and sentences became final, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pierre Michel Darbouze appeals an order denying as untimely his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Based on the record before us and the State’s proper and commendable confession of error that his motion was timely because the trial court incorrectly calculated the date Dar-bouze’s judgments and sentences became final, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 So. 3d 1192, 2017 WL 1927714, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darbouze-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.