DaPonte v. Coyne-Fague

District Court, D. Rhode Island·Decided September 29, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-00222·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

____________________________________ ) JOHN T. DA PONTE, JR. ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-00222-MSM-PAS ) PATRICIA COYNE-FAGUE, et al ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

Mary S. McElroy, United States District Judge.

Mr. DaPonte has sued the Director and Medical Director of the R.I. Department of Corrections (“DOC”) alleging that they were deliberately indifferent to his need for Medication Assisted Treatment (“MAT”). The defendants moved to dismiss (ECF No. 29), alleging that the controversy has become moot by the plaintiff’s acceptance into a MAT program. Mr. DaPonte does not dispute that he was provided MAT services but alleges in his objection to dismissal that there were collateral consequences stemming from the delay which caused him to commit a number of prison infractions. He wants the Court to order those infractions removed from his disciplinary record. Although Mr. DaPonte is entitled to leeway as a litigant, the Court finds that even apart from the question of whether the defendants manifested deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, he has failed to allege sufficient facts to permit a conclusion that the defendants were the proximate cause of those infractions. 833 F. Supp.2d 165, 181-82 (D.P.R.

2011). In addition, the Complaint itself failed to allege that the record of the disciplinary actions was in any way tied to a constitutional violation: instead, Mr. DaPonte seeks to elevate the infractions into a constitutional violation that can support federal jurisdiction by tying them to the allegedly unconstitutional deprivation of medical treatment. However, even if there were sufficient causation to attribute the consequences of infractions to the defendants, the allegations of

deliberate indifference are limited to the failure to provide a MAT program which has since been provided. The defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 29) is therefore GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

____________________________________ Mary S. McElroy, United States District Judge

Date: September 29, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DaPonte v. Coyne-Fague, (D.R.I. 2022).

DaPonte v. Coyne-Fague (DaPonte v. Coyne-Fague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramirez-Lluveras v. Pagan-Cruz
833 F. Supp. 2d 165 (D. Puerto Rico, 2011)