DAPHNE CAMPBELL v. NACIVRE CHARLES
This text of DAPHNE CAMPBELL v. NACIVRE CHARLES (DAPHNE CAMPBELL v. NACIVRE CHARLES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 5, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
Nos. 3D22-1558, 3D22-1770 Lower Tribunal No. 18-23821 ________________
Daphne Campbell, Appellant,
vs.
Nacivre Charles, Appellee.
Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.
Metschlaw, P.A., and Lawrence R. Metsch (Hollywood), for appellant.
Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Annabel C. Majewski; Jeffrey S. Greenhaus, P.A., and Jeffrey S. Greenhaus, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Radiology & Imaging Ctr.
of S. Fla., Inc., 761 So. 2d 399, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“If an Offer of Judgment is made at a point in time in which it appears, from the facts of the
individual case, that the Offer of Judgment is not directed to the current trial
period, but, rather, is intended for the next, as yet, unscheduled trial period,
then in that situation, and in that situation only, the Offer of Judgment is not
a nullity and is considered timely.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DAPHNE CAMPBELL v. NACIVRE CHARLES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daphne-campbell-v-nacivre-charles-fladistctapp-2023.