Danziger v. Shaknaitis

636 A.2d 846, 228 Conn. 914, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 22, 1993·No. SC 14872·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff Rita Johnson’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 6 (AC 12009), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff’s motion to amend the return date, having been filed after the original return date, could not be granted pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-72?”*

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danziger v. Shaknaitis, 636 A.2d 846, 228 Conn. 914, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 454 (Colo. 1993).

636 A.2d 846 (Danziger v. Shaknaitis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review
642 A.2d 1186 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)