Danziger v. Clark, United States Marshal

Ninth Circuit

Danziger v. Clark, United States Marshal

180 F.2d 895, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2522

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1950

Docket12189_1

StatusPublished

This text of 180 F.2d 895 (Danziger v. Clark, United States Marshal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Danziger v. Clark, United States Marshal, 180 F.2d 895, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2522 (9th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee in this appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant is no longer in the custody of the appellee.

The affidavit offered on behalf of the appellee states that the sentence, claimed in the application for the writ of habeas corpus to have been illegally imposed, has been ■fully served and appellant’s counsel at the hearing asserted that his client was not in the custody of the appellee.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee in this appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant is no longer in the custody of the appellee.

The affidavit offered on behalf of the appellee states that the sentence, claimed in the application for the writ of habeas corpus to have been illegally imposed, has been ■fully served and appellant’s counsel at the hearing asserted that his client was not in the custody of the appellee.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 F.2d 895, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danziger-v-clark-united-states-marshal-ca9-1950.