Danzig v. PDPA, INC.
This text of 14 A.3d 1005 (Danzig v. PDPA, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard A. DANZIG, Trustee
v.
PDPA, INC., et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Ahmed A. Dadi, pro se, and Patricia Dadi, pro se, in support of the petition.
Timothy P. Pothin, New Haven, in opposition.
The petition by the defendants Patricia Dadi and Ahmed A. Dadi for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 125 Conn.App. 242, 9 A.3d 382 (2010) and 125 Conn.App. 254, 11 A.3d 153 (2010), is denied.
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.3d 1005, 300 Conn. 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danzig-v-pdpa-inc-conn-2011.