Home/New York Court of Appeals/Danzig v. Dikman

Danzig v. Dikman

423 N.E.2d 402, 53 N.Y.2d 926, 440 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2486
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 423 N.E.2d 402 (Danzig v. Dikman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danzig v. Dikman, 423 N.E.2d 402, 53 N.Y.2d 926, 440 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2486 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Vincent A. Lupiano in that court (78 AD2d 303). In view of the recognition of the difference in determining when the liability of the insurer attaches under group medical insurance policies between the time of the occurrence of the event insured against and the time of the incurring of the expenses occasioned thereby — which determinations are generally resolved on the basis of the specific language used in the policies (e.g., Ann., 66 ALR3d 1205, 1208-1218; 68 ALR2d 249, 275-283) — the failure of the insurer to make unmistakably explicit provision in this policy as to which shall control creates an ambiguity which under familiar principles of construction is to be resolved against the insurer.

[928]*928Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016
Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
876 S.W.2d 132 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Kimm v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
160 Misc. 2d 97 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Novak v. TRW, INC.
822 F. Supp. 963 (E.D. New York, 1993)
Lessard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
568 A.2d 491 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1989)
Sonneman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota
403 N.W.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
Behr v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc.
715 S.W.2d 251 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1986)
Lutsky v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of Missouri
695 S.W.2d 870 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1985)
Donald F. Tackitt v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, United States of America, and Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.
758 F.2d 1572 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Fields v. Blue Shield of California
163 Cal. App. 3d 570 (California Court of Appeal, 1985)
Holzberg v. Mutual Life Insurance
104 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Guyer v. United States Fire Insurance
97 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Eckstein v. Monarch Life Insurance
82 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Goldfarb v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
423 N.E.2d 818 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 N.E.2d 402, 53 N.Y.2d 926, 440 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danzig-v-dikman-ny-1981.