Danzig v. City of Dexter

Eighth Circuit

Danzig v. City of Dexter

241 F. App'x 341

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2007·No. No. 06-2144·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Howard Danzig appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil action. Upon de novo review, see Stringer v. St. James R-1 Sch. Dist., 446 F.3d 799, 802 (8th Cir.2006), we conclude that the district court’s dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Howard Danzig appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil action. Upon de novo review, see Stringer v. St. James R-1 Sch. Dist., 446 F.3d 799, 802 (8th Cir.2006), we conclude that the district court’s dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Danzig v. City of Dexter, 241 F. App'x 341 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

241 F. App'x 341 (Danzig v. City of Dexter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related