Danza v. Danza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Danza v. Danza

13 A.D.3d 331, 785 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.3d 331 (Danza v. Danza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Danza v. Danza, 13 A.D.3d 331, 785 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated October 29, 2003, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for her attorneys to pay restitution pursuant to CELR 5015.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CELR 5511).

The plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the order as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for her attorney to pay restitution pursuant to CELR 5015. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by that portion of the order (see CELR 5511). Ritter, J.E, S. Miller, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated October 29, 2003, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for her attorneys to pay restitution pursuant to CELR 5015.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CELR 5511).

The plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the order as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for her attorney to pay restitution pursuant to CELR 5015. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by that portion of the order (see CELR 5511). Ritter, J.E, S. Miller, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.3d 331, 785 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danza-v-danza-nyappdiv-2004.