Danza v. Danza
This text of 771 N.E.2d 828 (Danza v. Danza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or leave to appeal to [634]*634the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the complaint, dismissed as untimely as the prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d ed]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
771 N.E.2d 828, 98 N.Y.2d 633, 744 N.Y.S.2d 756, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danza-v-danza-ny-2002.