Danwill Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Danwill Co. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 329, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1518

United States Customs Court·Decided January 11, 1950·No. No. 53892; protest 148166-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were in fact not landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were in fact not landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Danwill Co. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 329, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1518 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

24 Cust. Ct. 329 (Danwill Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.