Dantuma v. Spectrum Health, Butterworth Occupational Health, Inc.

712 N.W.2d 472, 474 Mich. 1125
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 2006
Docket130028
StatusPublished

This text of 712 N.W.2d 472 (Dantuma v. Spectrum Health, Butterworth Occupational Health, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dantuma v. Spectrum Health, Butterworth Occupational Health, Inc., 712 N.W.2d 472, 474 Mich. 1125 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

712 N.W.2d 472 (2006)
474 Mich. 1125

Robert DANTUMA and Shelly Dantuma, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SPECTRUM HEALTH, BUTTERWORTH OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, INC., d/b/a Spectrum Health Occupational Services, and Dr. Robert Richmond, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130028. COA No. 262867.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 N.W.2d 472, 474 Mich. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dantuma-v-spectrum-health-butterworth-occupational-mich-2006.