Dantone v. Rodgers & Haggerty, Inc.

125 N.Y.S. 481
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 11, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 125 N.Y.S. 481 (Dantone v. Rodgers & Haggerty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dantone v. Rodgers & Haggerty, Inc., 125 N.Y.S. 481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

This is a common-law action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence. The proof is unsatisfactory and meager. The plaintiff proved that, while he was in defendant’s employ, working on a ditch in Canal street, some dirt and stones fell on him, causing the injuries complained of. There was no evidence to show what caused the dirt and stones to fall, or that the defendant’s failure to exercise due care was in any way responsible for the accident.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 N.Y.S. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dantone-v-rodgers-haggerty-inc-nyappterm-1910.