Dantone v. Dantone
Opinion
The appellee, Dr. Joseph D. Dantone, in reliance on the provisions of Article 573' of the Code of Practice, as amended by Act 49 of 1871 and Section 1 of Act 24 of 1930,1 has filed here a motion to have dismissed his wife’s suspensive and devolutive appeal from a judgment rejecting her demand for a separation from bed and board, contending that inasmuch as her appeal was perfected more than 30 days following the date of such judgment it cannot be suspensive, and that, thereafter, there can be no devolutive appeal in such a suit.
This contention is not well taken for the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:4452' (Article 573 of the Code of Practice as-amended by Act 24 of 1930), ordinarily-controlling in appeals from judgments-granting separations or divorces, being in derogation of the right of appeal (which finds favor in the law), must be strictly construed, and are, therefore, inapplicable [635]*635here since the judgment appealed from is not a final judgment of separation from bed .and board, but, instead, a judgment rejecting the plaintiff’s suit for a separation from bed and board, which is governed and tested by other articles of the Code of Practice, and, thereunder, the appeal will be maintained as devolutive since there is nothing to suspend. See Cortez v. Cortez, 175 La. 179, 143 So. 41.
For the reasons assigned, the appeal is •dismissed as suspensive, but maintained as •devolutive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
89 So. 2d 149 (Dantone v. Dantone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.