Dante G. Fredrick v. Eric Watson
This text of Dante G. Fredrick v. Eric Watson (Dante G. Fredrick v. Eric Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ June 08, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21A0776. DANTE G. FREDRICK v. ERIC WATSON.
Inmate Dante G. Fredrick submitted a pro se civilian warrant against Sheriff Eric Watson to the superior court. The superior court denied the filing of the action, and Fredrick filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Fredrick is incarcerated, so his appeal is controlled by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8, an appeal in a civil action filed by a prisoner “shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” And under OCGA § 5-6-35, the party wishing to appeal must file an application for discretionary appeal to the appropriate appellate court. Because a prisoner has no right of direct appeal in civil cases, we lack jurisdiction to consider this direct appeal. See Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/08/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dante G. Fredrick v. Eric Watson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dante-g-fredrick-v-eric-watson-gactapp-2021.