Dante Davis v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 2014
Docket14-5011
StatusPublished

This text of Dante Davis v. State of Florida (Dante Davis v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dante Davis v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DANTE DAVIS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-5011

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Dante Davis, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

LEWIS, C.J., THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dante Davis v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dante-davis-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2014.