Dantagnan v. Mancuso

267 So. 2d 732, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6073
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 6, 1972·No. No. 5219·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

REDMANN, Judge.

On motion of defendant Mancuso (and on our own motion as to the remaining defendant) this appeal is dismissed in its entirety as untimely. Judgment was rendered and notice sent June 22, 1971; motion for new trial filed July 2 was untimely, C.C.P. art. 1974, and therefore the 90 day delay for devolutive appeal ran from expiration of the delay for applying for a new trial, C.C.P. art. 2087 subd. (1). Accordingly the petition and order of appeal of December 8, 1971 came too late since the judgment had become definitive, C.C.P. art. 1842 and CC. art. 3556, subd. 31.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dantagnan v. Mancuso, 267 So. 2d 732, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6073 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

267 So. 2d 732 (Dantagnan v. Mancuso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeves v. Reeves
315 So. 2d 162 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)
Brown v. Theriot
293 So. 2d 206 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)