Dant & Russell, Inc. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 736, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2379
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 23, 1967
DocketR.D. 11313; Entry No. 2608, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 736 (Dant & Russell, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dant & Russell, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 736, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2379 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

LaNdis, Judge:

On call of the calendar at the term of court in Mobile on March 14, 1967, defendant moved to dismiss the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule A, attached to and made a part hereof, on the ground that said appeals were untimely filed.

The official papers show that the merchandise of these appeals was appraised on September 28, 1966, and written notice thereof, on C.F. [737]*7374301, mailed to the consignee or his agent on October 6, 1966. The appeals were not filed until November 8,1966, more than 30 days after the date of mailing of the written notice of appraisement. These appeals are, therefore, untimely under section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1501).

On motion of defendant, to which plaintiff raised no objection, these appeals are dismissed on the ground that they are untimely.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 736, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dant-russell-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.