Dansville Central School District v. Dansville Teachers' Ass'n

86 A.D.2d 962, 448 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15659
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and stay granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in holding that the grievance is subject to [963] arbitration. The demand for arbitration recited violations only of the sections defining categories of grievance. The association is required to state a substantive violation of the agreement with enough specificity to enable the court to determine the threshold issue of whether it is arbitrable. The stay is therefore granted with leave to the association to file an appropriate notice to arbitrate setting forth those provisions of the bargaining agreement which allegedly have been violated (see Matter of Enlarged City School Dist. of Troy [Troy Teachers Assn.], 79 AD2d 738, 739; Matter of Board of Educ. v Palmyra-Macedon Faculty Assn., 78 AD2d 765, 766). Special Term correctly held that the failure to claim a grievance under article X-2(A)(1) at the initial stage of the grievance process is a matter of procedural arbitrability for resolution by the arbitrator (see Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1, 8-9). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — stay arbitration.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dansville Central School District v. Dansville Teachers' Ass'n, 86 A.D.2d 962, 448 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

86 A.D.2d 962 (Dansville Central School District v. Dansville Teachers' Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverhead Central School District v. Riverhead Central Faculty Ass'n
140 A.D.2d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)