Dansville Central School District v. Dansville Teachers' Ass'n
This text of 86 A.D.2d 962 (Dansville Central School District v. Dansville Teachers' Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and stay granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in holding that the grievance is subject to [963]*963arbitration. The demand for arbitration recited violations only of the sections defining categories of grievance. The association is required to state a substantive violation of the agreement with enough specificity to enable the court to determine the threshold issue of whether it is arbitrable. The stay is therefore granted with leave to the association to file an appropriate notice to arbitrate setting forth those provisions of the bargaining agreement which allegedly have been violated (see Matter of Enlarged City School Dist. of Troy [Troy Teachers Assn.], 79 AD2d 738, 739; Matter of Board of Educ. v Palmyra-Macedon Faculty Assn., 78 AD2d 765, 766). Special Term correctly held that the failure to claim a grievance under article X-2(A)(1) at the initial stage of the grievance process is a matter of procedural arbitrability for resolution by the arbitrator (see Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1, 8-9). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — stay arbitration.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.D.2d 962, 448 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dansville-central-school-district-v-dansville-teachers-assn-nyappdiv-1982.