Dansinger v. White

New York Supreme Court

Dansinger v. White

29 N.Y.S. 1142, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 869

DecidedMay 26, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.Y.S. 1142 (Dansinger v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dansinger v. White, 29 N.Y.S. 1142, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

MAYHAM, P. J.

The conclusions of law reached by the learned judge who tried this case seem to be the proper legal deductions, based upon the facts found by him. The facts found by the judge seem to be based upon undisputed evidence, or upon conflicting evidence, upon which a finding either way would be sustained on appeal. We have carefully examined the various objections and exceptions made by the defendant to the rulings of the trial judge, and find no trror for which the judgment should be reversed. ■ An opinion, therefore, seems unnecessary. Judgment affir.med, wiih costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAYHAM, P. J.

The conclusions of law reached by the learned judge who tried this case seem to be the proper legal deductions, based upon the facts found by him. The facts found by the judge seem to be based upon undisputed evidence, or upon conflicting evidence, upon which a finding either way would be sustained on appeal. We have carefully examined the various objections and exceptions made by the defendant to the rulings of the trial judge, and find no trror for which the judgment should be reversed. ■ An opinion, therefore, seems unnecessary. Judgment affir.med, wiih costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.Y.S. 1142, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dansinger-v-white-nysupct-1894.