Dansig v. Roman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dansig v. Roman

358 So. 2d 860, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15579

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 1978·No. No. 77-1645·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge.

It appears from the record before this court that an order was entered by the trial court rescinding a previous order and deciding other substantive issues without notice or an opportunity to be heard by one of the parties. This was not proper. Lieberman v. Marshall, 236 So.2d 120 (Fla.1970).

Accordingly, the trial court’s order of June 29, 1977 is hereby reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANSTEAD, Judge.

It appears from the record before this court that an order was entered by the trial court rescinding a previous order and deciding other substantive issues without notice or an opportunity to be heard by one of the parties. This was not proper. Lieberman v. Marshall, 236 So.2d 120 (Fla.1970).

Accordingly, the trial court’s order of June 29, 1977 is hereby reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Dansig v. Roman, 358 So. 2d 860, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

358 So. 2d 860 (Dansig v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related