Danser v. Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7187

DAVID KARL DANSER,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN STANSBERRY,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00271-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Karl Danser, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Karl Danser, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his

previously dismissed 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Danser v. Stansberry, No. 2:07-cv-00271-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr.

16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED