Danser v. Boyle

16 N.J.L. 395

Opinion

By the Court.

That part of the demand charging for exchange of horses, should not be stated as matter of book account, as it is here: but should be specially set forth.

This defect is not cured by its being mingled with a correct charge of the book account.

Dayton, J.

This charge could not be pleaded in bar of another suit.

Judgment reversed.

Cited in Inslee v. Prall, 3 Zab. 460.