Danser v. Boyle
16 N.J.L. 395
This text of 16 N.J.L. 395 (Danser v. Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Danser v. Boyle, 16 N.J.L. 395 (N.J. 1838).
Opinion
That part of the demand charging for exchange of horses, should not be stated as matter of book account, as it is here: but should be specially set forth.
This defect is not cured by its being mingled with a correct charge of the book account.
This charge could not be pleaded in bar of another suit.
Judgment reversed.
Cited in Inslee v. Prall, 3 Zab. 460.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 N.J.L. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danser-v-boyle-nj-1838.