Dansby v. Hobbs

569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2767, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 506561, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4223
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 3, 2013
DocketNo. 12–8582.
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 569 U.S. 1015 (Dansby v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dansby v. Hobbs, 569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2767, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 506561, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4223 (2013).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1747, 185 L.Ed.2d 783 (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chatman v. Sayler
D. North Dakota, 2022
Sabot v. Pringle
D. North Dakota, 2020
Bridges v. Bertsch
D. North Dakota, 2019
Poitra v. North Dakota
79 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D. North Dakota, 2015)
Dansby v. Hobbs
766 F.3d 809 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Ray Dansby v. Ray Hobbs
Eighth Circuit, 2014
Dwayne Woods v. Stephen Sinclair
764 F.3d 1109 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Nooner v. State
2014 Ark. 296 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2014)
Rodney Reed v. William Stephens, Director
739 F.3d 753 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Ha Nguyen v. Ben Curry
736 F.3d 1287 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2767, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 506561, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dansby-v-hobbs-scotus-2013.