Dansby v. Hobbs
569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2767, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 506561, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4223
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 3, 2013·No. No. 12–8582.·Published·Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. ----,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dansby v. Hobbs, 569 U.S. 1015, 186 L. Ed. 2d 215, 133 S. Ct. 2767, 81 U.S.L.W. 3668, 2013 WL 506561, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4223 (2013).
569 U.S. 1015 (Dansby v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chatman v. Sayler
D. North Dakota, 2022
Sabot v. Pringle
D. North Dakota, 2020
Bridges v. Bertsch
D. North Dakota, 2019
Wisham v. North Dakota, State of
D. North Dakota, 2018
Poitra v. North Dakota
79 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D. North Dakota, 2015)
Dansby v. Hobbs
766 F.3d 809 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Ray Dansby v. Ray Hobbs
Eighth Circuit, 2014
Dwayne Woods v. Stephen Sinclair
764 F.3d 1109 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Nooner v. State
2014 Ark. 296 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2014)
Rodney Reed v. William Stephens, Director
739 F.3d 753 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Ha Nguyen v. Ben Curry
736 F.3d 1287 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)