Dano v. United States

Third Circuit

Dano v. United States

91 F.2d 1012, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 216, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419, 20 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 216

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedAugust 5, 1937

DocketNo. 6384

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 91 F.2d 1012 (Dano v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dano v. United States, 91 F.2d 1012, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 216, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419, 20 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 216 (3d Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the court below Nick Dano was tried, convicted, and sentenced on an indictment charging him with certain violations of Joint Resolution No. 373, section 1162a, .title 26 U.S.C.A., and Regulation 17 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. , Thereupon he took this appeal from an order of the court denying his motio.n in arrest of judgment, and the question involved is the constitutionality of such legislation and regulation. That question was decided in an opinion of the judge below reported in (D.C.) 20 F.Supp. 458.

After consideration had, we affirm the court’s action, adopting its opinion as the view of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the court below Nick Dano was tried, convicted, and sentenced on an indictment charging him with certain violations of Joint Resolution No. 373, section 1162a, .title 26 U.S.C.A., and Regulation 17 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. , Thereupon he took this appeal from an order of the court denying his motio.n in arrest of judgment, and the question involved is the constitutionality of such legislation and regulation. That question was decided in an opinion of the judge below reported in (D.C.) 20 F.Supp. 458.

After consideration had, we affirm the court’s action, adopting its opinion as the view of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 F.2d 1012, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 216, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419, 20 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dano-v-united-states-ca3-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack