Danny Wayne Alcoser v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-22-00283-CR
DANNY WAYNE ALCOSER, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-1261-C1, Honorable Thomas C. West, Presiding
October 26, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Danny Wayne Alcoser, filed a document with this Court seeking to
appeal a trial court order issued on July 13, 2022. We have construed the document as
a notice of appeal. Assuming, arguendo, that we have the authority to review the order
as part of appellant’s previously transferred appeal, see Alcoser v. State, No. 07-18-
00032-CR, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 5722, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 9, 2022, no pet.
h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication), we dismiss the current appeal for want of
jurisdiction because it was untimely filed. The trial court issued the order on July 13, 2022. A notice of appeal from the order
was, therefore, due within thirty days, by August 12, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2).
Appellant filed a notice of appeal with this Court on October 11, 2022. Because the timely
filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to hearing an appeal, we
have no option but to dismiss the untimely appeal for want of jurisdiction. Castillo v. State,
369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Danny Wayne Alcoser v. the State of Texas (Danny Wayne Alcoser v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.