Danny Ochoa v. State
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 19, 2002
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Danny Ochoa seeks to appeal his felony conviction based on a plea of guilty. The punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by Ochoa. To invoke the court's jurisdiction over this appeal, rule 25.2(b)(3) requires that the notice of appeal specify that the appeal is from a jurisdictional defect, specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or state that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Because Ochoa's notice of appeal does not meet any of the requirements of rule 25.2(b)(3), our jurisdiction has not been properly invoked, and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Danny Ochoa v. State (Danny Ochoa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.