Danny Moore v. Gene Beasley

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-1985 ___________________________

Danny R. Moore

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________

Submitted: January 15, 2019 Filed: January 29, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Danny Moore appeals after the district court1 dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he asserted his prior burglary convictions no longer qualified as

1 The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). career-offender predicates after Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243, 2257 (2016). Upon careful de novo review, see Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 2004), we conclude that Moore’s claim does not entitle him to relief. See, e.g., Martin v. United States, 904 F.3d 594, 597 (8th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-