Danny Lamont Yarborough v. James B. Hunt, Jr. Franklin Freeman Lynn C. Phillips Joseph Lofton
This text of 74 F.3d 1235 (Danny Lamont Yarborough v. James B. Hunt, Jr. Franklin Freeman Lynn C. Phillips Joseph Lofton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Danny Lamont YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
James B. HUNT, Jr.; Franklin Freeman; Lynn C. Phillips;
Joseph Lofton, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-7007.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 23, 1996.
Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Hunt, No. CA-95-459-5 (E.D.N.C. June 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38801, 1996 WL 23193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danny-lamont-yarborough-v-james-b-hunt-jr-franklin-ca4-1996.