Danny J. Cole v. State
This text of Danny J. Cole v. State (Danny J. Cole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED JUNE 1997 SESSION August 15, 1997
Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk DANNY JOE COLE, ) ) APPELLANT, ) ) No. 01-C-01-9608-CR-00333 ) ) Davidson County v. ) ) J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge ) ) (Habeas Corpus) RICKY BELL, Warden, ) ) APPELLEE. )
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
Geoffrey Coston John Knox Walkup Attorney at Law Attorney General & Reporter 2813 West End Avenue 500 Charlotte Avenue Nashville, TN 37203 Nashville, TN 37243-0497
Daryl J. Brand Assistant Attorney General 450 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243-0493
Victor S. Johnson, III District Attorney General Washington Square, Suite 500 222 Second Avenue, North Nashville, TN 37201-1649
Katrin N. Miller Assistant District Attorney General Washington Square, Suite 500 222 Second Avenue, North Nashville, TN 37201-1649
OPINION FILED:________________________________
AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20
Joe B. Jones, Presiding Judge OPINION
The appellant, Danny Joe Cole (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judgment of
the trial court dismissing his suit for the writ of habeas corpus. While the trial court
addressed the merits of the grounds set forth in the petition, the court concluded the
judgment was at best voidable, not void, and the remedy of habeas corpus was not
available to the petitioner to attack the sentences previously imposed. In this Court, the
petitioner contends the Tennessee Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989 violates Article
II, Section 2, the Separation of Powers Clause, of the Tennessee Constitution; and the Act
is inconsistent with the determinate sentencing provisions contained in the Act.
After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the
law governing the issues presented for review, it is the opinion of this Court that the
judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Tennessee
Court of Criminal Appeals.
_____________________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
CONCUR:
______________________________________ WILLIAM M. BARKER, JUDGE
______________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Danny J. Cole v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danny-j-cole-v-state-tenncrimapp-1997.