Danny Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC

Michigan Supreme Court

Danny Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC

DecidedJune 13, 2014

Docket147727

StatusPublished

This text of Danny Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC (Danny Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Danny Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC, (Mich. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 13, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147727 & (60) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly DANNY EPPS and JOYCE EPPS, Brian K. Zahra Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Bridget M. McCormack Cross-Appellants, David F. Viviano, v SC: 147727 Justices COA: 305731 Wayne CC: 09-018323-NO 4 QUARTERS RESTORATION, L.L.C., DENAGLEN CORP., d/b/a MBM CHECK CASHING, EMERGENCY INSURANCE SERVICES, and TROY WILLIS, Defendants-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, and AM ADJUSTING & APPRAISALS, L.L.C., MICHAEL N. ANDERSON, JR., HOME OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, PAULA MATHEWS, MAXIMUM RESTORATION, L.L.C., AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARLES WILLIS, and COMERICA BANK, Defendants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the contracts and limited power of attorney at issue are void or merely voidable, and whether the plaintiffs are required to establish actual damages to recover on their breach of contract and fraud/misrepresentation claims. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 13, 2014 p0610 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 13, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147727 & (60) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly DANNY EPPS and JOYCE EPPS, Brian K. Zahra Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Bridget M. McCormack Cross-Appellants, David F. Viviano, v SC: 147727 Justices COA: 305731 Wayne CC: 09-018323-NO 4 QUARTERS RESTORATION, L.L.C., DENAGLEN CORP., d/b/a MBM CHECK CASHING, EMERGENCY INSURANCE SERVICES, and TROY WILLIS, Defendants-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, and AM ADJUSTING & APPRAISALS, L.L.C., MICHAEL N. ANDERSON, JR., HOME OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, PAULA MATHEWS, MAXIMUM RESTORATION, L.L.C., AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, CHARLES WILLIS, and COMERICA BANK, Defendants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the contracts and limited power of attorney at issue are void or merely voidable, and whether the plaintiffs are required to establish actual damages to recover on their breach of contract and fraud/misrepresentation claims. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 13, 2014 p0610 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Danny Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danny-epps-v-4-quarters-restoration-llc-mich-2014.