Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 10, 2022·No. 13-21-00163-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00163-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

DANNY BERYMON, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion for access to the appellate record.

On August 26, 2021, appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been

unable to examine the record in order to file an amended pro se brief, if any.

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and it is hereby ordered that the trial court

ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues. It is further ordered that the trial

court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available

to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record

is first made available to him to file his amended pro se brief, if any, with this Court. The

State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 10th day of March, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas (Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)