Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas
This text of Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas (Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00163-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
DANNY BERYMON, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion for access to the appellate record.
On August 26, 2021, appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been
unable to examine the record in order to file an amended pro se brief, if any.
Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and it is hereby ordered that the trial court
ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues. It is further ordered that the trial
court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available
to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Furthermore, appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record
is first made available to him to file his amended pro se brief, if any, with this Court. The
State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 10th day of March, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Danny Berymon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danny-berymon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.