Danny Aragonmarquez v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Order entered November 15, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-22-00186-CR
DANNY ARAGONMARQUEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-12099-U
ORDER
Before the Court is appellant’s November 9, 2022 motion seeking a third
extension of time to file appellant’s brief. In the motion, appellant explains that the
brief has not been filed because appellant and a member of appellant’s family have
informed appellate counsel that the family has retained attorney Scottie Allen to
represent appellant in this appeal. The Court has not received any communication
from Mr. Allen showing he is representing appellant. Appellant requests an extension to November 23, 2022 so that appointed counsel may determine the
status of appellant’s representation and file the brief.
We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file, by
November 23, 2022, either appellant’s brief or a motion to substitute counsel. If
appellant fails to comply with this order, the Court may abate this appeal so allow
the trial court to conduct a hearing on the status of appellant’s representation and
brief.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Danny Aragonmarquez v. the State of Texas (Danny Aragonmarquez v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.