Danny Alan Vestal v. Franklin Freeman

66 F.3d 318, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33566, 1995 WL 551277
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 18, 1995·No. 95-6938·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

66 F.3d 318

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Danny Alan VESTAL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6938.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided: Sept. 18, 1995.

Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vestal v. Freeman, No. CA-95-422-F (E.D.N.C. May 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danny Alan Vestal v. Franklin Freeman, 66 F.3d 318, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33566, 1995 WL 551277 (4th Cir. 1995).

66 F.3d 318 (Danny Alan Vestal v. Franklin Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt
106 F.3d 553 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Vestal v. Clinton
Fourth Circuit, 1997