Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt

86 F.3d 1154, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42315, 1996 WL 267289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 F.3d 553
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 1996·No. 96-6089·Unpublished

Opinion

86 F.3d 1154

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Danny Alan VESTAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bill CLINTON; James B. Hunt, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6089.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: May 21, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-752)

Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vestal v. Clinton, No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt, 86 F.3d 1154, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42315, 1996 WL 267289 (4th Cir. 1996).

86 F.3d 1154 (Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related