D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio

111 A. 925, 92 N.J. Eq. 236, 7 Stock. 236, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 319
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

[237]*237For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio, 111 A. 925, 92 N.J. Eq. 236, 7 Stock. 236, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1920).

111 A. 925 (D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lysick v. Lysick
220 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)