D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio

111 A. 925, 92 N.J. Eq. 236, 7 Stock. 236, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 319
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 21, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 A. 925 (D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio, 111 A. 925, 92 N.J. Eq. 236, 7 Stock. 236, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 319 (N.J. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

[237]*237For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lysick v. Lysick
220 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A. 925, 92 N.J. Eq. 236, 7 Stock. 236, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dannunzio-v-dannunzio-nj-1920.