Dannick v. County of Onondaga
191 A.D.2d 964, 595 N.Y.S.2d 709
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dannick v. County of Onondaga. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 A.D.2d 963 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1993·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J. — Negligence.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dannick v. County of Onondaga, 191 A.D.2d 964, 595 N.Y.S.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
191 A.D.2d 964 (Dannick v. County of Onondaga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)