Danner v. Shissler
This text of 31 Pa. 289 (Danner v. Shissler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where one acquires an estate by devise or descent from his father, and dies seised of it, and his next of kin on his father’s side are uncles and aunts, our intestate law of 1833, §§ 7, 8, 9, makes no distinction between whole and half blood, among such uncles and aunts. It is enough for inheritance, that they are “of the blood of the ancestor of the intestate.” It is different where brothers and sisters inherit from each other; for then the whole bloods are preferred: §§ 4, 6.
This cause was decided agreeably to this expression of the law, and several previous cases demonstrate that it was rightly decided : 5 Whart. 477. If we should go back to the grandfather, from whom the estate came, 6 W. & S. 261, 8 State R. 37, to trace the inheritable blood (which the act does not seem to contemplate), the case becomes still more plain; for, counting from him, all the claimants are “ of the whole blood.”
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Pa. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danner-v-shissler-pa-1858.