D'Anneo v. Sperry Gyroscope Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

D'Anneo v. Sperry Gyroscope Company, Inc.

259 A.D. 766, 18 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 766 (D'Anneo v. Sperry Gyroscope Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D'Anneo v. Sperry Gyroscope Company, Inc., 259 A.D. 766, 18 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the self-insurer from the decision and award of the State Industrial Board awarding the claimant the sum of $533.25 representing thirty-three and one-third per cent loss of the use of the right arm [thumb]. The issues were: first, whether the State Industrial Board has the right to reopen the ease after disallowance of the claim by a referee; and second, whether the award appealed from may be based upon medical testimony made on June 27th. An examination of the evidence in the record sustains the award appealed from. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the self-insurer from the decision and award of the State Industrial Board awarding the claimant the sum of $533.25 representing thirty-three and one-third per cent loss of the use of the right arm [thumb]. The issues were: first, whether the State Industrial Board has the right to reopen the ease after disallowance of the claim by a referee; and second, whether the award appealed from may be based upon medical testimony made on June 27th. An examination of the evidence in the record sustains the award appealed from. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 766, 18 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danneo-v-sperry-gyroscope-company-inc-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack