Dannebroge Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Allment

26 Cal. 286
California Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1864·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.

The Court below erred in excluding the certificate of incorporation and accompanying evidence. The sixth section of the Act concerning incorporations, as amended in 1862, (Statutes, of 1862, p. 110,) provides that the question of the due incorporation of any company claiming in good faith to be a corporation under the laws of this State, and doing business as such corporation, or of its right to exercise corporate powers, shall not be inquired into, collaterally, in any private suit to which such de facto corporation may be a party; but such inquiry may be had at the suit of the State on information of the Attorney-General.’ ’

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dannebroge Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Allment, 26 Cal. 286 (Cal. 1864).

26 Cal. 286 (Dannebroge Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Allment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Society Perun v. Cleveland
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 481 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)
People v. Hagar
52 Cal. 171 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Pacific Bank v. De Ro
37 Cal. 538 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.
37 Cal. 354 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
People v. Frank
28 Cal. 507 (California Supreme Court, 1865)