Dannebroge Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Allment

26 Cal. 286
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 26 Cal. 286 (Dannebroge Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Allment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dannebroge Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Allment, 26 Cal. 286 (Cal. 1864).

Opinion

By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.

The Court below erred in excluding the certificate of incorporation and accompanying evidence. The sixth section of the Act concerning incorporations, as amended in 1862, (Statutes, of 1862, p. 110,) provides that the question of the due incorporation of any company claiming in good faith to be a corporation under the laws of this State, and doing business as such corporation, or of its right to exercise corporate powers, shall not be inquired into, collaterally, in any private suit to which such de facto corporation may be a party; but such inquiry may be had at the suit of the State on information of the Attorney-General.’ ’

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Society Perun v. Cleveland
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 481 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)
People v. Hagar
52 Cal. 171 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Pacific Bank v. De Ro
37 Cal. 538 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.
37 Cal. 354 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
People v. Frank
28 Cal. 507 (California Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Cal. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dannebroge-gold-quartz-mining-co-v-allment-cal-1864.