D'Anna v. Goldburg
This text of 272 A.D.2d 825 (D'Anna v. Goldburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting reargument of motion to strike out the second, fourth and sixth defenses of defendant Goldburg, and the first defense of defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and on reargument vacating the order theretofore entered and denying the motion, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danna-v-goldburg-nyappdiv-1947.